top of page

What's Your K8S Distro's Flavor?!

What is your Kubernetes Distribution Flavor


Child eating icecream. Representing different flavors of Kubernetes Distributions
created with DALL- E / CANVA

Get clarity on Kubernetes distribution models! These models primarily include "Vanilla 🍦" Kubernetes distribution, Vendor-specific distributions 🍧, and Customized distributions🍨. So what's your flavor?

First Things First

Kubernetes is an open-source project that has many distributions, tools, and platforms that are built on top of it or integrated with it. DevOps and Business Owners need to ensure that their chosen Kubernetes distribution is compatible with their existing infrastructure, applications, services, and workflows. They also need to consider the interoperability, portability, scalability, reliability, and performance of their Kubernetes clusters across different clouds, regions, and environments. But what to choose when there is so much to pick from 🤔🙄?!


Kubernetes Deployment & Distribution Models


Kubernetes deployment models refer to different approaches for deploying Kubernetes clusters. There are three main deployment models: on-premises, cloud-based, and hybrid. On-premises deployment involves deploying Kubernetes on infrastructure owned and managed by the organization. Cloud-based deployment utilizes public cloud platforms to deploy and manage Kubernetes clusters, providing scalability and flexibility. Hybrid deployment combines both on-premises and cloud-based deployments, allowing businesses to leverage the benefits of each environment. The choice of the deployment model depends on factors such as scalability needs, cost optimization, resource constraints, security requirements, and operational expertise, ensuring businesses can deploy Kubernetes in a manner that best suits their unique needs.


  • On-Premises Deployment: In this model, Kubernetes is deployed on infrastructure owned and managed by the organization within its own data centers or private cloud environments. It provides full control over the infrastructure and allows for customization based on specific business needs or security requirements.

  • Cloud-Based Deployment: Kubernetes can be deployed on public cloud platforms like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud Platform (GCP). It leverages the cloud provider's infrastructure, providing scalability, flexibility, and managed Kubernetes services. It eliminates the need for managing hardware and enables faster deployment and scalability.

  • Hybrid Deployment: Hybrid deployment combines both on-premises and cloud-based deployments. It allows businesses to leverage the benefits of both environments, keeping certain workloads or sensitive data on-premises while utilizing the cloud for scalability, flexibility, and cost optimization.


Explanation Of The Cloud Deployment Models

Kubernetes distribution models encompass different approaches to obtaining and utilizing Kubernetes software. There are three main distribution models: vanilla Kubernetes distribution, vendor-specific distributions, and customized distributions.


  • Vanilla Kubernetes distribution: refers to the official Kubernetes distribution provided directly by the Kubernetes project, offering core features without vendor-specific modifications.

  • Vendor-specific distributions: are Kubernetes offerings provided by cloud providers, software vendors, or managed service providers, bundled with additional features and tools tailored to specific platforms, making it easier to deploy and manage Kubernetes in those environments.

  • Customized distributions: are created by organizations, enabling them to select and integrate specific components, tools, or configurations based on their unique requirements. This allows businesses to have fine-grained control over the Kubernetes stack and optimize it according to their needs.


The choice of distribution model depends on factors such as platform compatibility, additional features needed, customization requirements, and operational preferences, enabling businesses to leverage Kubernetes in the most suitable manner.




Kubernetes Distribution Model Comparison

Once you have a clear understanding of whether your requirements lean towards Container-as-a-Service (CaaS) or abstracted platforms, you can begin comparing different offerings.

  • Community-Supported Distributions: Free and open-source packages that allow you to deploy Kubernetes independently and experiment with it. Examples include Minikube, which provides a genuine Kubernetes environment for local and experimental deployments on a single computer.

  • Vendor Distro (No Value-Add): Companies that offer software solutions or cloud-based platforms providing pure Kubernetes with vendor-backed support. These distributions focus primarily on delivering the core Kubernetes framework without additional enhancements.

  • Vendor Distro (With Value-Add): Companies that provide more comprehensive environments incorporating scheduling, development, and lifecycle management capabilities. These distributions feature Kubernetes as the foundation of their systems and offer additional tools and services to enrich the Kubernetes experience.

  • App Platforms / PaaS: Full-scale Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solutions like Red Hat OpenShift, which abstract the management and maintenance of Kubernetes. These platforms provide end-to-end, automated development and deployment environments, simplifying the utilization of Kubernetes for application development.

For those seeking more exhaustive information, there is a frequently updated, community-managed list of Kubernetes distributions available on the official Kubernetes website (https://kubernetes.io/).



Kubernetes Distribution Model Vendors

Why Does it Matter?


Knowing the different Kubernetes distributions matters for both DevOps and Business Owners because:

  • For DevOps: different Kubernetes distributions offer different levels of ease of installation, configuration, management, and integration with other tools and platforms. DevOps need to choose the right Kubernetes distribution that suits their specific needs and preferences, such as the container runtime, storage, networking, security, monitoring, etc. DevOps also need to keep up with the latest updates and features of their chosen Kubernetes distribution, as well as the compatibility issues with other components of their cloud-native architecture.


  • For Business Owners, different Kubernetes distributions have different costs, benefits, and risks associated with them. Business Owners need to evaluate the trade-offs between various Kubernetes distributions in terms of their performance, scalability, reliability, availability, and security. Business Owners also need to consider the vendor lock-in and support options of their chosen Kubernetes distribution, as well as the potential impact on their business goals and customer satisfaction.

Therefore, knowing the different Kubernetes distributions can help both DevOps and Business Owners make informed decisions that optimize their cloud-native applications and services.


Deployment & Distribution By Business Scenarios

Navigating the Kubernetes deployment and distribution landscape can be complex, but understanding these scenarios and their corresponding business benefits will help you make informed decisions. By choosing the right deployment and distribution models, you can harness the true potential of Kubernetes to scale your business, optimize costs, streamline operations, fortify security, leverage vendor-specific advantages, and tailor your infrastructure to your unique requirements. The following scenarios will guide you on your journey:


  • Scaling Needs: If your business is experiencing rapid growth or anticipates a surge in demand, it may be beneficial to explore cloud-based deployment models. Cloud platforms offer scalability, allowing you to easily add resources and handle increased workloads without the need to invest in additional hardware or data center expansion.

  • Cost Optimization: If cost optimization is a priority, evaluating different deployment models can help. On-premises deployments may provide more control over infrastructure costs, while cloud-based models offer the advantage of pay-as-you-go pricing and reduced upfront capital expenditure.

  • Resource Constraints: If your business has limited IT resources or expertise, opting for a managed Kubernetes service from a cloud provider might be advantageous. These services handle the operational aspects of Kubernetes, allowing your team to focus on application development and innovation.

  • Security and Compliance: If your business operates in a regulated industry or has specific security requirements, on-premises or hybrid deployments may be necessary to maintain control over sensitive data and comply with regulations.

  • Vendor-Specific Features: If your business requires specific integrations, tools, or features provided by a particular cloud vendor or distribution, exploring vendor-specific Kubernetes distributions can be beneficial. These offerings often come with added functionalities designed to streamline deployment and management within their ecosystem.

  • Customization Needs: If your business has unique requirements or workflows that necessitate a tailored Kubernetes stack, considering a customized distribution allows you to select and integrate specific components and configurations to meet those needs precisely.

Choosing the appropriate deployment and distribution models depends on factors such as infrastructure preferences, scalability needs, data security requirements, operational expertise, and the level of control desired by the organization. Furthermore, it's essential to factor elements in such as scalability cost, resource availability, security & compliance, and customization requirements. By aligning the choice of deployment and distribution models with your business needs, you can optimize your Kubernetes implementation for success and ensure efficient resource utilization, scalability, and agility that aligns with your specific business goals.


Advantages, Disadvantages, Challenges & Considerations


Advantages:

  • Community-Supported Distributions; These are Kubernetes distributions that are maintained by the open-source community, such as Kubernetes, Kubeadm, Kubespray, and Minikube. Some of the advantages of these distros are:

    1. They are free and open-source, which means anyone can use, modify, and contribute to them.

    2. They are aligned with the upstream Kubernetes project, which means they benefit from the latest features, bug fixes, and security patches.

    3. They are flexible and customizable, which means users can configure them according to their specific needs and preferences.


  • Vendor Distro (No Value-Add); These are Kubernetes distributions that are offered by cloud providers or vendors, but do not provide any additional features or services on top of the vanilla Kubernetes, such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS). Some of the advantages of these distros are:

    1. They are easy to set up and manage, as the cloud provider or vendor handles the installation, configuration, scaling, and updating of the Kubernetes clusters.

    2. They are integrated with other cloud services and features, such as storage, networking, security, monitoring, etc.

    3. They are reliable and available, as the cloud provider or vendor ensures high uptime and performance of the Kubernetes clusters.

    4. They are cost-effective, as the cloud provider or vendor offers pay-as-you-go pricing models and discounts for long-term usage.


  • Vendor Distro (With Value-Add); These are Kubernetes distributions that are offered by cloud providers or vendors, but also provide some additional features or services that enhance the vanilla Kubernetes experience, such as Red Hat OpenShift, Rancher, VMware Tanzu, and Canonical Charmed Kubernetes. Some of the advantages of these distros are:

    1. They are secure and compliant, as they offer advanced security features and certifications, such as encryption, RBAC, network policies, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, etc.

    2. They are flexible and customizable, as they allow users to choose their own container runtime, storage, networking, and orchestration tools.

    3. They are compatible and portable, as they support multiple clouds, regions, and environments, such as hybrid cloud, edge computing, etc.

    4. They are innovative and agile, as they enable users to deploy various applications and services, such as machine learning, serverless, etc.


  • App Platforms / PaaS; These are platforms that provide a higher level of abstraction and automation for deploying and managing applications on top of Kubernetes clusters. Some examples of these platforms are:

    1. Heroku: A cloud platform that simplifies the development and deployment of web applications using various languages and frameworks.

    2. Cloud Foundry: An open-source platform that supports multiple clouds and provides a consistent developer experience for building and running applications using various languages and frameworks.

    3. Pivotal Web Services: A hosted version of Cloud Foundry that offers a fully managed service for deploying and scaling applications on AWS.

    4. IBM Cloud Code Engine: A serverless platform that runs any containerized or source code-based application on a managed Kubernetes cluster.


Disadvantages:

  • Community-Supported Distributions; Some of the disadvantages of these distros are:

    1. They require more technical knowledge and skills to deploy and manage them. Users need to have adequate internal experience and expertise to select, install, configure, monitor, troubleshoot, and update their Kubernetes distributions.

    2. They may not be compatible with some cloud services or features that require specific integrations or configurations. Users need to ensure that their chosen Kubernetes distribution is compatible with their existing infrastructure, applications, services, and workflows.

    3. They may not provide enough support or documentation for users who encounter issues or need guidance. Users need to rely on the community forums, blogs, or GitHub issues for help or feedback.


  • Vendor Distro (No Value-Add); Some of the disadvantages of these distros are:

    1. They may not offer enough customization or flexibility for users who have specific needs or preferences. Users may be limited by the choices or options provided by the cloud provider or vendor for their container runtime, storage, networking, and orchestration tools.

    2. They may introduce vendor lock-in or dependency for users who want to switch or migrate to another cloud provider or vendor. Users may face challenges or costs in moving their Kubernetes clusters and applications across different clouds, regions, or environments.

    3. They may not support some of the latest features or updates of the upstream Kubernetes project. Users may have to wait for the cloud provider or vendor to adopt or implement the new features or patches for their Kubernetes distributions.


  • Vendor Distro (With Value-Add); Some of the disadvantages of these distros are:

    1. They may be more expensive or complex than the vanilla Kubernetes distributions. Users may have to pay extra fees or licenses for the additional features or services provided by the cloud provider or vendor. Users may also have to deal with more components or layers in their Kubernetes architecture.

    2. They may not be fully aligned with the upstream Kubernetes project. Users may encounter some differences or discrepancies between the vanilla Kubernetes and the modified Kubernetes distributions. Users may also have to adapt to the specific workflows or processes of the cloud provider or vendor.

    3. They may not be compatible with some of the other cloud-native technologies or tools that integrate with Kubernetes. Users may have to use the specific technologies or tools that are supported or provided by the cloud provider or vendor for their Kubernetes distributions.


  • App Platforms / PaaS; Some of the disadvantages of these platforms are:

    1. They may abstract away too much of the underlying Kubernetes details and logic. Users may lose some control or visibility over their Kubernetes clusters and applications. Users may also have less flexibility or customization for their Kubernetes configurations and settings.

    2. They may impose some limitations or restrictions on the types or sizes of applications that can be deployed and managed on them. Users may have to follow certain rules or conventions for their application development and deployment. Users may also have to deal with some performance or scalability issues for their applications.

    3. They may not support some of the advanced features or use cases of Kubernetes. Users may not be able to leverage some of the capabilities or benefits of Kubernetes, such as service mesh, machine learning, serverless, etc.


Challenges:

  • Security: Kubernetes is a complex and dynamic system that can expose many vulnerabilities if not properly secured. Users need to ensure that their Kubernetes clusters are protected from unauthorized access, malicious attacks, data breaches, and crypto-jacking. They also need to comply with various security standards and regulations, such as PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, etc. Some of the security challenges include: managing role-based access control (RBAC), enforcing network policies, encrypting data at rest and in transit, scanning containers for vulnerabilities, implementing backup and disaster recovery strategies, etc.


  • Expertise: Kubernetes is a fast-changing technology that requires a high level of technical knowledge and skills to deploy and manage. Users need to have adequate internal experience and expertise to select, install, configure, monitor, troubleshoot, and update their Kubernetes distributions. They also need to hire and retain qualified talent who can handle the complexity and diversity of Kubernetes environments. However, finding and hiring Kubernetes experts can be challenging due to the high demand and low supply of such professionals.


 

If you want to learn more about Kubernetes and become a certified Kubernetes Administrator (CKA) or Certified Kubernetes Application Developer (CKAD), You can sign up for our courses that will teach you everything you need to know about Kubernetes, from the basics to the advanced topics. You will also get access to labs, and our mentor, all of which will help you to prepare for the exams or you can simply join our community and meet like-minded folks for some flavored ice cream🍦!



 

  • Compatibility: Kubernetes is an open-source project that has many distributions, tools, and platforms that are built on top of it or integrated with it. Users need to ensure that their chosen Kubernetes distribution is compatible with their existing infrastructure, applications, services, and workflows. They also need to consider the interoperability, portability, scalability, reliability, and performance of their Kubernetes clusters across different clouds, regions, and environments. Some of the compatibility challenges include: choosing the right Kubernetes version, selecting the appropriate container runtime and orchestration tool, integrating with other cloud-native technologies, such as service mesh, serverless, etc., migrating legacy applications to Kubernetes, etc.

Considerations:

  • Cost: The cost of running and managing Kubernetes clusters can vary depending on the type of distribution, cloud provider, vendor, platform, features, services, usage patterns, etc. Users need to evaluate the trade-offs between various options in terms of their performance, scalability, reliability, availability, and security. Users also need to consider the vendor lock-in and support options of their chosen option, as well as the potential impact on their business goals and customer satisfaction.


  • Value: The value of using Kubernetes clusters can depend on the type of application, the environment, and the preferences of the users. Users need to assess the benefits and drawbacks of using Kubernetes for their specific use cases and scenarios, such as hybrid cloud, edge computing, machine learning, serverless, etc. Users also need to measure the value proposition and return on investment of using Kubernetes for their cloud-native applications and services.


Best Approach

The best approach when deciding between the different Kubernetes distributions depends on your specific needs, preferences, and goals. However, here are some general steps that you can follow to make an informed decision:

  • Define your use case and requirements: You need to identify the type of application or service that you want to deploy and manage on Kubernetes, as well as the environment and the preferences that you have for your Kubernetes clusters. Some of the factors that you need to consider are the container runtime, storage, networking, security, monitoring, scalability, reliability, availability, performance, etc.

  • Compare the features and benefits of different distributions: You need to evaluate the trade-offs between various Kubernetes distributions in terms of their features and benefits. You can use the summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the different distro types that I provided earlier as a reference. You can also use some online tools or platforms that compare different Kubernetes distributions based on various criteria, such as KubeSail, Kubedex, or Kubevious.

  • Test and validate your chosen distribution: You need to test and validate your chosen Kubernetes distribution before deploying it in production. You can use some tools or platforms that allow you to create and manage Kubernetes clusters on different distributions for free or at a low cost, such as Katacoda, Play with Kubernetes, or KubeSail. You can also use some tools or platforms that help you monitor and troubleshoot your Kubernetes clusters on different distributions, such as Prometheus, Grafana, or Lens.

These are some of the steps that you can follow when deciding between the different Kubernetes distributions.


 

KUBE-WHAT?!


  • KubeSail: KubeSail is a cloud platform that allows you to create and manage Kubernetes clusters on different distributions for free or at a low cost. You can use KubeSail to learn, experiment, and deploy Kubernetes applications without worrying about the infrastructure or the cost. You can also use KubeSail to monitor and troubleshoot your Kubernetes clusters using various tools and features

  • Kubedex: Kubedex is an online tool that compares different Kubernetes distributions based on various criteria, such as performance, scalability, security, reliability, etc. You can use Kubedex to find the best Kubernetes distribution for your specific needs and preferences. You can also use Kubedex to learn more about the features and benefits of each Kubernetes distribution

  • Kubevious: Kubevious is a suite of app-centric assurance, validation, and introspection products for Kubernetes. It helps you run modern Kubernetes applications without disasters and costly outages by continuously validating application manifests, cluster state, and configuration. You can use Kubevious to see correlated application configurations, identify issues and best practices violations, travel back in time and identify why things failed, define your own rules to validate configuration, and more


 



Signing Off

Kubernetes is a powerful and popular technology that can help you build and run cloud-native applications and services. However, choosing the right Kubernetes distribution can be a challenging and daunting task, as there are many options and factors to consider. This blog reads like a summary of the advantages, disadvantages, challenges, and considerations of the different distro types, as well as some steps and tools that will help you make an informed decision with no brain freeze 🥶. So one last question:



Koob Mascote IceCream Kubernetes Distro

Welcome to our #K8SNation, start your Kubernetes DevOps journey today. Join us! #K8SMastery Courses | Community | Coaching







Comments


bottom of page